As a journalist, I can report that Exxon and Chevron shareholders have recently cut support for climate resolutions. This decision comes after years of pressure from environmental activists and investors who have been pushing for greater action on climate change.

According to recent reports, Exxon shareholders voted against a proposal that would have required the company to set targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, Chevron shareholders rejected a proposal that would have required the company to report on its efforts to reduce emissions from its products.

This move by Exxon and Chevron shareholders has been met with criticism from environmental groups, who argue that these companies are not doing enough to address the urgent threat of climate change. They argue that without clear targets and reporting requirements, these companies will continue to contribute to the global climate crisis.

However, supporters of Exxon and Chevron argue that these companies are already taking steps to reduce their carbon footprint and that additional reporting requirements would be unnecessary and burdensome.

As a journalist, it is important to remain impartial and present both sides of the argument. It is also important to verify information and sources to ensure that the reporting is accurate and reliable. In this case, it is clear that there are differing opinions on the actions of Exxon and Chevron shareholders, and it will be interesting to see how this story develops in the coming weeks and months.