As a journalist, I am happy to take on your suggestion request. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a technology that has been gaining attention in recent years as a potential solution to reducing carbon emissions. However, there are still many misconceptions surrounding this technology that need to be addressed.

One common misconception is that CCS is not an effective solution for reducing carbon emissions. However, research has shown that CCS can play a significant role in reducing emissions, particularly in industries such as power generation and cement production. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), CCS could contribute to reducing global carbon dioxide emissions by up to 20% by 2050.

Another misconception is that CCS is too expensive to be practical. While it is true that CCS can be expensive, the cost has been decreasing in recent years as the technology has become more widely adopted. In fact, a study by the Global CCS Institute found that the cost of CCS has decreased by 40% since 2011.

There is also a misconception that CCS is not safe and could lead to environmental damage. However, research has shown that CCS can be done safely and without causing harm to the environment. The key is to ensure that the carbon dioxide is stored in a secure and stable location, such as deep saline formations or depleted oil fields.

Overall, it is important to dispel these misconceptions surrounding CCS and recognize its potential as a solution for reducing carbon emissions. As a journalist, it is my duty to provide accurate and unbiased reporting on this topic, and to help educate the public on the benefits and limitations of this technology.