One of the most alarming indications of a disregard for judicial authority comes from recent whistleblower claims in the Justice Department. According to former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni, senior official Emil Bove suggested defying court orders to deport detainees accused of gang affiliations—proposing that the department simply “ignore” unfavorable rulings. If a future administration treats court decisions as optional, it would breach a core democratic principle: that the judiciary has the final say on legal disputes.
Under Trump’s first term, agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) expanded their enforcement tactics in ways critics say aligned with political goals. Despite falling border crossings, ICE increased raids—sometimes detaining even U.S. citizens—and deployed masked agents in American cities in measures compared to authoritarian regimes. In a second term, fears grow that ICE and other agencies (DHS, DOJ) could be further politicized to target opponents, chilling dissent and undermining civil liberties.
Beyond day-to-day tactics, Project 2025 outlines a broader plan for restructuring the federal government to concentrate power in the presidency. Critics like NYU scholar Ruth Ben-Ghiat describe it as an “authoritarian takeover” aiming to dismantle neutral civil service protections and install loyalists across agencies. Such a shake-up would undercut the independence of regulatory bodies, hamper enforcement of environmental or financial safeguards, and erode the legal culture that restrains executive overreach.
A recent thematic review warns that constitutional democracy in the U.S. faces a rapid assault under a second Trump administration, with universities, courts, the press, and legal professionals coming under political pressure. When key pillars—free press, independent judiciary, academic freedom—are intimidated, the feedback loops that correct governmental error weaken. Citizens lose trust in public institutions, and democracy’s self-correcting mechanisms falter.
Trump’s first term set a precedent for directing investigations at political enemies. An emerging pattern under his reelection campaign shows potential use of the DOJ to open probes into critics, judges, and even private citizens who “get on the president’s bad side”. This approach weaponizes law enforcement, shifting it from neutral arbiter to political tool—a direct threat to equal application of the law.
An emboldened second term could see continued efforts to restrict media access. Already, certain outlets face blacklists and lawsuits for unfavorable coverage, while networks supportive of Trump receive privileged treatment. By controlling which journalists gain White House access and penalizing critical voices, the administration undermines the First Amendment and the essential watchdog role of a free press.
Senator Lisa Murkowski’s recent dissent highlights worry among some Republicans about Trump’s impact on the courts: from stacking federal benches with loyalists to demanding nominees who will side with executive authority a move that threatens judicial checks on power and she warns of “erosion of U.S. democratic norms”. If judges fear retribution or career harm for ruling against the administration, they may hesitate to enforce constitutional limits on presidential actions.
When courts and agencies lose independence, civil rights suffer. Lawsuits challenging discriminatory policies or defending protest rights become fraught if the DOJ refuses to defend rulings it dislikes. The chilling effect extends to marginalized communities, who rely on judicial protection against overreaching government power. A second Trump term risks reversing progress on voting rights, immigration relief, and anti-discrimination protections.
America’s global standing rests on its image as a rule-of-law democracy. If the U.S. executive repeatedly defies court orders, politicizes agencies, and silences dissent, foreign partners may question treaty commitments and legal arbitration. Authoritarian rivals seize on U.S. backsliding to justify their own abuses, further weakening democratic norms worldwide.
Preventing erosion requires active measures:
By reinforcing democratic institutions, citizens help ensure that no president stands above the law
Subscribe to our newsletter!
