In a move to boost their corporate value and demonstrate their strong financial health, Japanese technology giants Fujitsu and Hitachi have announced plans to ramp up their share buybacks.

Fujitsu, a leading provider of IT services and solutions, has announced its intention to buy back up to 100 billion yen ($912 million) worth of its own shares by the end of September 2022. The company has stated that the buyback program is aimed at “enhancing capital efficiency and shareholder returns” and reflects its confidence in its future growth prospects.

Similarly, Hitachi, a global conglomerate with businesses spanning multiple sectors including power systems, railway systems, and digital solutions, has announced plans to buy back up to 200 billion yen ($1.8 billion) worth of its own shares by the end of March 2022. The company has cited the buyback program as part of its efforts to “enhance shareholder returns and improve capital efficiency.”

Share buybacks are a way for companies to return capital to their shareholders, as they reduce the number of outstanding shares and increase the value of each remaining share. This can also be seen as a signal of confidence in the company’s future growth prospects, as the company is effectively investing in itself.

The announcements from Fujitsu and Hitachi come as Japan’s government is pushing for companies to prioritize shareholder returns and improve corporate governance. The government has set a target of achieving a 10% return on equity (ROE) for all listed companies by 2020, and has been urging companies to take measures to improve their ROE, including share buybacks.

The move towards share buybacks also reflects a wider trend among Japanese companies, as they seek to deploy their cash reserves in a way that benefits shareholders. In recent years, many Japanese companies have been criticized for hoarding large amounts of cash and not doing enough to return capital to shareholders.

However, share buybacks have also come under scrutiny in some quarters, with critics arguing that they can be a sign of a lack of investment opportunities and can lead to short-termism. There are also concerns that companies may prioritize share buybacks over other uses of cash, such as investment in research and development or capital expenditures.

Despite these concerns, share buybacks remain a popular way for companies to return capital to their shareholders, and the announcements from Fujitsu and Hitachi are likely to be welcomed by investors. Both companies have reported strong earnings in recent quarters, and the buyback programs are seen as a way to reward shareholders for their support.

In conclusion, the announcement of share buyback programs by Fujitsu and Hitachi reflects a wider trend among Japanese companies to prioritize shareholder returns and improve corporate governance. While share buybacks are not without their critics, they remain a popular way for companies to return capital to their shareholders, and the announcements are likely to be welcomed by investors. As Japan’s government continues to push for companies to prioritize shareholder returns, it will be interesting to see whether other companies follow Fujitsu and Hitachi’s lead in ramping up their buyback programs.

GoTo, the Singaporean ride-hailing and food delivery giant, has been facing intense pressure from investors to turn a profit after reporting massive losses over the past few years. In response, the company has announced a series of cost-cutting measures aimed at reducing expenses and boosting profitability. However, the question remains: will these measures be enough to reinvigorate GoTo’s stock prices?

Background on GoTo’s financial situation

GoTo, formerly known as Grab, has grown rapidly since its launch in 2012. The company now operates in over 400 cities across eight countries in Southeast Asia, offering a wide range of services including ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payments. However, despite its rapid growth and dominance in the region, GoTo has yet to turn a profit.

In fact, the company reported a net loss of $2.7 billion in 2020, up from $1.3 billion in 2019. This loss was primarily due to heavy investments in new services, aggressive expansion into new markets, and intense competition with other ride-hailing and food delivery companies.

GoTo’s loss-cutting measures

To address its financial challenges, GoTo has announced a series of measures aimed at reducing costs and boosting profitability. These measures include:

  1. Job cuts: In January 2022, GoTo announced that it would lay off 5% of its workforce, or around 360 employees, across several departments including engineering, sales, and marketing. The company also announced plans to merge its ride-hailing and food delivery teams, resulting in the consolidation of some roles.
  2. Focus on core businesses: GoTo has stated that it will focus on its core businesses of ride-hailing and food delivery, and will divest from non-core businesses such as financial services and travel. The company has already sold its Indonesian e-commerce business, Kudo, and is reportedly in talks to sell its car rental business, rental car.
  3. Reduction in subsidies: GoTo has also announced plans to reduce subsidies for its ride-hailing and food delivery services, which have been a major driver of customer acquisition but also a significant expense for the company. The reduction in subsidies could lead to higher prices for customers, which could impact demand for GoTo’s services.

Impact on GoTo’s stock prices

The announcement of these loss-cutting measures has been met with a mixed response from investors. On one hand, some analysts believe that the measures are necessary for GoTo to become profitable and sustain its growth over the long term. On the other hand, others are concerned that the reduction in subsidies and potential price increases could lead to a decline in customer demand and revenue.

Since the announcement of the measures, GoTo’s stock prices have fluctuated. In the short term, the stock prices have been volatile, with investors reacting to each piece of news related to the company’s financial performance and prospects. However, it remains to be seen whether the loss-cutting measures will have a significant impact on GoTo’s stock prices over the long term.

The future of GoTo

GoTo is facing intense competition from other ride-hailing and food delivery companies in Southeast Asia, including Uber, Gojek, and Deliveroo. The company’s success will depend on its ability to continue innovating, expanding into new markets, and offering competitive pricing and services.

The loss-cutting measures announced by GoTo are a step in the right direction, but it remains to be seen whether they will be enough to turn the company’s.

The race for artificial intelligence (AI) dominance is heating up as tech giants Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft continue to pour massive resources into their respective AI programs. Despite cost-cutting measures in other areas, these companies remain committed to investing in AI as they view it as a key driver of future growth and innovation.

Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has been leading the charge in AI research and development for years. In 2013, the company launched its AI research group, Facebook AI Research (FAIR), which has since grown to over 100 researchers working on a wide range of AI-related projects. FAIR’s work includes developing computer vision systems, natural language processing algorithms, and deep learning models.

In addition to FAIR, Meta has also acquired several AI startups in recent years, including Wit.ai, Ozlo, and Bloomsbury AI. These acquisitions have helped to expand Meta’s AI capabilities and accelerate its research efforts. Meta’s AI initiatives are also heavily integrated into the company’s products and services, such as its facial recognition technology and its News Feed algorithm.

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has also been heavily invested in AI research and development. The company’s AI efforts are centered around its Google Brain team, which is focused on developing deep learning models and other AI technologies. Google Brain has made significant progress in areas such as natural language processing, image recognition, and speech recognition.

In addition to Google Brain, Alphabet has also made a number of high-profile AI acquisitions in recent years, including DeepMind, a UK-based AI startup that specializes in machine learning, and Kaggle, a platform for data scientists to compete on predictive modeling and analytics projects. These acquisitions have helped to bolster Alphabet’s AI capabilities and accelerate its research efforts.

Microsoft is also a major player in the AI arms race. The company has invested heavily in AI research and development, with a particular focus on natural language processing and computer vision. Microsoft’s AI initiatives are centered around its Microsoft Research division, which has over 1,000 researchers working on a wide range of AI-related projects.

In addition to Microsoft Research, the company has also made several AI acquisitions in recent years, including Maluuba, a startup focused on deep learning for natural language understanding, and Bonsai, a platform for building and deploying AI models. Microsoft’s AI initiatives are also integrated into its products and services, such as its Cortana virtual assistant and its Azure cloud computing platform.

Despite the high cost of AI research and development, these companies remain committed to investing in AI as they view it as a key driver of future growth and innovation. However, the competition for AI talent and resources is fierce, and smaller companies and startups may struggle to keep up with the deep pockets of these tech giants.

There are also concerns about the potential risks of AI, such as job displacement and the misuse of AI technologies for surveillance and other nefarious purposes. As these companies continue to invest heavily in AI, it will be important for them to also consider the ethical implications of their work and to develop responsible AI practices.

In conclusion, the AI arms race shows no signs of slowing down as tech giants such as Meta, Alphabet, and Microsoft continue to double down on their AI initiatives. While the potential benefits of AI are vast, it will be important for these companies to also consider the potential risks and to develop responsible AI practices that prioritize ethical considerations.

Alignment Growth, a media investment fund, has secured $360 million in funding from Insight Partners to invest in innovative media companies. The fund, which is backed by Crunchbase, aims to identify and support media companies that leverage technology and data to disrupt traditional models and create new opportunities for growth.

The investment from Insight Partners is a major milestone for the fund, which launched last year with an initial $125 million funding round. The fund has already made several successful investments, including in companies such as The Athletic and Group Nine Media.

The partnership with Crunchbase is a key advantage for the fund, providing access to valuable data and insights on emerging trends in the media industry. Crunchbase is a leading provider of data on startups and tech companies, and its platform is a valuable resource for investors seeking to identify promising investment opportunities.

In a statement, the founders of Alignment Growth emphasized the importance of data and technology in driving innovation in the media industry. “We believe that the future of media is data-driven, and that companies that are able to leverage technology to create more personalized, engaging content will be the most successful,” they said.

The investment from Insight Partners is a vote of confidence in the fund’s strategy, and a sign of the growing interest in data-driven media investments. Insight Partners is a global investment firm with a strong track record of investing in successful technology companies, and its support is likely to attract further interest from other investors.

However, the media industry is facing significant challenges, including increasing competition from new players and changing consumer preferences. In order to succeed, media companies will need to be able to adapt to these changes and create innovative products and services that meet the evolving needs of consumers.

One of the key advantages of the Alignment Growth fund is its focus on data and technology, which can help media companies to better understand their audiences and create more engaging content. This approach has already been successful for companies like The Athletic and Group Nine Media, which have been able to leverage data and technology to create compelling, personalized content that resonates with their audiences.

In conclusion, the investment from Insight Partners is a major milestone for the Alignment Growth media fund, and a sign of the growing interest in data-driven media investments. The fund’s focus on technology and data is well-suited to the rapidly evolving media landscape, where innovation and disruption are becoming increasingly important. With the support of Insight Partners and Crunchbase, the fund is well-positioned to continue identifying promising investment opportunities and helping to drive innovation in the media industry.

In a significant ruling for the sports industry, a court confirmed the market value of the television rights of the Washington Nationals, which could set a precedent for future disputes over broadcast fees.

The case, known as the MASN case, involved a dispute between the Washington Nationals and the Baltimore Orioles over the amount of money the Nationals were due for their television rights. The teams had been sharing the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network (MASN) since the Nationals moved to Washington, D.C., in 2005. The network was owned by the Orioles, who had majority control of the network.

Under their agreement, the Nationals were entitled to an increase in their television rights fees every five years. However, when the time came for the increase in 2012, the Orioles argued that the Nationals should receive a smaller fee than what they were asking for, as they claimed that the Nationals’ market value had not increased as much as they had claimed.

The dispute eventually led to a legal battle, with an arbitration panel awarding the Nationals a higher fee than what the Orioles had offered. However, the Orioles appealed the decision, leading to a prolonged legal battle that finally reached the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

In a unanimous decision, the court upheld the arbitration panel’s ruling, confirming the market value of the Nationals’ television rights. The decision could have significant implications for the sports industry, as it could set a precedent for other teams in disputes over broadcast fees.

The court’s decision relied on the fact that the arbitration panel had carefully considered the relevant evidence and had come to a reasonable conclusion based on that evidence. The panel had looked at a variety of factors, including the Nationals’ performance on the field, their popularity among fans, and the size of the Washington, D.C. market, in determining the team’s market value.

The court’s decision is a significant victory for the Nationals, who had argued that they were entitled to a higher fee based on their increased popularity and success on the field. The ruling could also have implications for other sports teams, particularly those in smaller markets, who may now be emboldened to demand higher fees for their television rights.

The MASN case is just one of many disputes over television rights fees that have plagued the sports industry in recent years. As more and more consumers cut the cord and turn to streaming services for their entertainment, the value of television rights has become increasingly important for sports teams.

The case also highlights the importance of arbitration in resolving disputes between sports teams. Arbitration is a commonly used method of resolving disputes in the industry, as it allows teams to avoid lengthy and costly legal battles.

Overall, the MASN case is a significant ruling for the sports industry, as it could set a precedent for future disputes over broadcast fees. The decision confirms the importance of arbitration in resolving these disputes and underscores the importance of carefully considering the relevant evidence in determining the market value of a team’s television rights.

The annual NFL Draft is upon us, and the excitement is palpable as teams prepare to select the best available talent to help them compete for the Lombardi Trophy. With the first round of the draft set to take place on April 28, many fans and analysts are eagerly anticipating which players will be chosen by which teams.

In this article, we will provide a comprehensive mock draft of the first round, making bold predictions and providing analysis on each pick. So sit back, relax, and let’s dive into our complete NFL first-round mock draft.

  1. Jacksonville Jaguars – Trevor Lawrence, QB, Clemson There’s not much debate here, as Lawrence has been the consensus top prospect in this year’s draft for quite some time. The Jaguars have a new head coach in Urban Meyer and are in need of a franchise quarterback to build around. Lawrence has all the tools to be that player, with his accuracy, arm strength, and mobility. He’s the clear choice at No. 1.
  2. New York Jets – Zach Wilson, QB, BYU The Jets traded away Sam Darnold, signaling their intention to take a quarterback with the second pick. Wilson has been gaining momentum in recent weeks and is now widely considered the second-best QB in the draft. He has a quick release, great arm talent, and is a strong athlete. Wilson has the potential to be the Jets’ franchise quarterback for years to come.
  3. San Francisco 49ers (from Miami Dolphins via Houston Texans) – Mac Jones, QB, Alabama This pick has been the subject of much speculation, with many believing the 49ers will select Ohio State’s Justin Fields or North Dakota State’s Trey Lance. However, recent reports suggest that Jones is the favorite to be San Francisco’s choice. He has been praised for his accuracy, decision-making, and ability to read defenses. Jones is a smart and efficient passer who could thrive in Kyle Shanahan’s system.
  4. Atlanta Falcons – Kyle Pitts, TE, Florida The Falcons are reportedly open to trading down from this spot, but if they stay put, Pitts would be an excellent pick. He’s a matchup nightmare with his size, speed, and athleticism, and has drawn comparisons to former All-Pro tight end Antonio Gates. Pitts would provide an immediate impact in the Falcons’ passing game and give Matt Ryan another weapon to work with.
  5. Cincinnati Bengals – Penei Sewell, OT, Oregon Protecting Joe Burrow should be the Bengals’ top priority, and Sewell is the best offensive tackle in the draft. He’s a dominant run blocker and has the agility and technique to be a top pass protector as well. Sewell is a plug-and-play starter who would provide an immediate upgrade to Cincinnati’s offensive line.
  6. Miami Dolphins (from Philadelphia Eagles) – Ja’Marr Chase, WR, LSU The Dolphins traded down from the third pick, but they still have a chance to add a dynamic playmaker to their offense with Chase. He opted out of the 2020 season but was dominant in 2019, catching 84 passes for 1,780 yards and 20 touchdowns. Chase has a rare combination of size, speed, and physicality, and would give Tua Tagovailoa a true No. 1 receiver.
  7. Detroit Lions – Jaylen Waddle, WR, Alabama The Lions traded away Matthew Stafford and need to give Jared Goff some weapons to work with. Waddle is one of the fastest players in the draft and has the ability to take the top off the defense on any play. He’s also a threat in the return game and could provide an immediate impact on special teams.

Canada’s satellite phone service is set to receive a major upgrade, as SpaceX and Rogers Communications announced a new partnership to bring satellite phone service to the country. The move is expected to shake up the Canadian telecommunications market, which has been dominated by a few major players for years.

The announcement came on March 14th, when SpaceX and Rogers announced a deal that will see the two companies work together to launch a network of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites that will provide satellite phone service across Canada. The new network is expected to be faster and more reliable than existing satellite phone networks, and will provide coverage across the country, including in remote and rural areas where traditional cellular networks are often unreliable or nonexistent.

“This is a game changer for Canadian telecommunications,” said Joe Natale, President and CEO of Rogers Communications, in a statement. “Our partnership with SpaceX will bring world-class satellite phone service to Canadians, no matter where they are. This is an exciting time for Rogers, and for our customers.”

The new network will use SpaceX’s Starlink satellites, which are designed to provide high-speed internet access to remote areas around the world. SpaceX has launched more than 1,500 Starlink satellites to date, and plans to launch thousands more in the coming years. The company’s low Earth orbit satellites are designed to provide faster, more reliable internet access than traditional satellite networks, which are often slow and expensive.

Rogers, one of Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, will provide the ground infrastructure for the new network, including the satellite phones themselves. The company says it plans to offer a range of plans and pricing options to customers, including both pre-paid and post-paid plans.

“By partnering with SpaceX, we’re able to bring the benefits of satellite technology to Canadians in a way that’s never been done before,” said Natale. “We’re excited to be at the forefront of this new era in satellite phone service, and we’re confident that Canadians will love what we have to offer.”

The move comes as demand for satellite phone service is on the rise in Canada, particularly in remote and rural areas where traditional cellular networks are often unreliable or nonexistent. Satellite phones are also popular with outdoor enthusiasts and adventurers who need to stay connected when they’re off the grid.

However, the cost of satellite phone service has long been a barrier to adoption. Traditional satellite phone networks are often slow and expensive, with high per-minute costs and limited coverage areas. The new network from SpaceX and Rogers is expected to address these issues, offering faster speeds and more reliable service at a lower cost.

The partnership between SpaceX and Rogers is also expected to have a major impact on the Canadian telecommunications market, which has been dominated by a few major players for years. The new network is expected to provide competition to existing satellite phone providers, as well as to traditional cellular providers like Bell and Telus.

“Competition is always good for consumers,” said Natale. “We’re confident that our new satellite phone service will provide Canadians with a fast, reliable, and affordable option for staying connected, no matter where they are.”

The new network is expected to launch in 2022, with initial coverage areas in northern Canada. SpaceX and Rogers say they plan to expand coverage across the country in the coming years, with the goal of providing coverage to 100% of Canadians.

Overall, the new partnership between SpaceX and Rogers is expected to be a major boost to satellite phone service in Canada, providing faster, more reliable service at a lower cost. It’s also expected to bring much-needed competition to the Canadian telecommunications market, which has long been dominated by a few major players. As the network launches in 2022 and expands across the country in the coming years, Canadians will have more options than ever when it comes to staying connected, no

In a groundbreaking move for the tech industry, workers at YouTube have voted to unionize, forming the Alphabet Workers Union. The decision comes after a year of organizing efforts by employees seeking better working conditions, fair pay, and greater control over content moderation policies.

The vote was conducted by mail-in ballot, and the final results were announced on Monday. Of the eligible workers, 66% voted in favor of unionizing, with a total of 965 ballots cast. The union will represent workers in the United States and Canada who create, produce, and curate content for YouTube.

The decision to unionize marks a significant shift in the tech industry, which has long resisted organized labor. Tech companies, including YouTube’s parent company Alphabet, have often relied on a contingent workforce of contractors and gig workers who lack the job security and benefits afforded to traditional employees.

In a statement, the newly formed union declared, “We are uniting to protect our rights and build a more ethical and equitable workplace for everyone who contributes to the success of YouTube.” The statement also emphasized the importance of worker solidarity and the need for collective bargaining power to address issues of workplace safety, diversity and inclusion, and content moderation policies.

The unionization effort at YouTube was driven by a diverse group of employees, including content moderators, engineers, and creators. These workers have raised concerns about the toll that content moderation can take on mental health, the lack of transparency in algorithmic decision-making, and the impact of monetization policies on their livelihoods.

The Alphabet Workers Union is affiliated with the Communications Workers of America (CWA), a labor union representing workers in the telecommunications and media industries. The CWA has been actively organizing tech workers in recent years, with campaigns at companies such as Amazon, Google, and Facebook.

The formation of the Alphabet Workers Union is a significant milestone in the ongoing struggle for workers’ rights in the tech industry. While the tech industry has long been regarded as a bastion of innovation and progress, it has also been criticized for its labor practices, including the use of low-wage contractors, the exploitation of gig workers, and the lack of diversity and inclusion in the workforce.

The decision by YouTube workers to unionize could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, where workers have traditionally had little bargaining power. The unionization effort at YouTube has already inspired workers at other tech companies, with reports of unionization efforts at companies such as Kickstarter, Glitch, and Coinbase.

However, the decision to unionize has also been met with resistance from some within the tech industry. Some have criticized the unionization effort as a threat to innovation and a potential source of conflict between workers and management. Others have argued that tech workers are already well-compensated and do not need a union.

Despite the challenges ahead, the decision by YouTube workers to unionize represents a significant victory for workers’ rights in the tech industry. It signals a growing recognition among workers of the need for collective bargaining power and a more equitable distribution of power in the workplace. As the tech industry continues to grow and transform, the role of organized labor in shaping its future is likely to become an increasingly important topic of discussion.

The ongoing rivalry between social media giants Facebook and TikTok has taken a new turn, with Meta’s Vice President Nick Clegg accusing TikTok of being a threat to national security. Clegg, who was previously the UK Deputy Prime Minister, made the remarks in a recent interview with the BBC, citing TikTok’s ownership by Chinese company ByteDance as a key concern.

The accusation is part of a larger trend of anti-China rhetoric that has been on the rise in recent years, particularly in the United States and other Western countries. The concern is that Chinese companies, which are often closely linked with the government, could use their access to user data to conduct espionage or other nefarious activities.

TikTok, which has become hugely popular among young people around the world, has repeatedly denied any such accusations, saying that it stores user data in the United States and other countries outside of China. The company has also emphasized that its data is not subject to Chinese law, and that it has a transparent process for handling requests from governments for user data.

Despite these assurances, the company has faced intense scrutiny from governments around the world. In the United States, the Trump administration attempted to ban the app outright, citing national security concerns. The ban was later overturned by a court, but the controversy has continued to simmer.

For its part, Meta (formerly known as Facebook) has been a vocal critic of TikTok in the past. The company has launched a rival app, Instagram Reels, which offers similar short-form video content. In addition, Meta has been a major player in the fight against Chinese tech companies more broadly, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg warning in 2019 that “while we are at a moment of real tension with China, I just think that we need to be very careful.”

Clegg’s remarks are likely to further inflame tensions between the two companies, as well as between Western countries and China more broadly. However, it remains to be seen what impact, if any, his words will have on the ongoing debate around TikTok and national security. For now, the app remains hugely popular, with over a billion users worldwide, and it seems unlikely that that will change anytime soon.

In the end, the ongoing controversy around TikTok is just one example of the larger issues around data privacy and national security that are likely to shape the future of the internet. As more and more of our lives are lived online, the question of who controls our data, and how it is used, will only become more important. It will be up to companies like TikTok and Meta to navigate these issues while still providing their users with the features and services they want and need.

Japan’s space technology company, Ispace, suffered a significant drop in its share price following the failure of its lunar lander mission. Ispace is one of the few companies that are focused on lunar exploration and has been developing its lunar lander and rover technology for several years.

The company’s lunar lander, known as the Hakuto-R, was launched on April 28th from the Tanegashima Space Center in southwestern Japan. The Hakuto-R mission was intended to test the performance of the lunar lander and its ability to travel on the moon’s surface. However, the mission ended in failure as the lander crashed onto the moon’s surface, causing a significant setback for Ispace’s lunar exploration plans.

Following the news of the failed mission, Ispace’s shares tumbled by more than 40% in a single day, with the company’s market value dropping by approximately $130 million. The sharp decline in Ispace’s share price highlights the risks and challenges associated with the space exploration industry, where the cost of developing and launching space technology is high, and the risks of failure are significant.

Ispace was founded in 2010 and has been developing lunar exploration technology, including its lunar lander and rover, as part of its long-term strategy to explore and utilize resources on the moon. The company has raised significant funds from investors, including Japan Airlines, Tokyo Broadcasting System Holdings, and Suzuki Motor.

The Hakuto-R lunar lander was developed with the support of the Japanese government, which is also keen on promoting lunar exploration as part of its space policy. The Japanese government has set a goal to send a Japanese astronaut to the moon by the mid-2030s and is investing in space technology companies like Ispace to achieve this goal.

Despite the setback, Ispace is determined to continue its lunar exploration plans and is already working on its next lunar mission, which is scheduled for launch in 2022. The company aims to launch its first commercial lunar mission in 2023, which involves the delivery of payloads to the moon’s surface for customers such as NASA and JAXA.

Ispace’s failed lunar mission serves as a reminder of the risks and challenges associated with space exploration, particularly for companies that are relatively new to the industry. However, it also highlights the importance of continued investment in space technology and exploration as it can lead to significant scientific and economic benefits, including the development of new technologies, the discovery of new resources, and the advancement of space-based industries.

As companies like Ispace continue to push the boundaries of space exploration, it is crucial for investors and policymakers to recognize the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with the industry and continue to support the development of space technology and exploration in a responsible and sustainable manner.